Friday, April 18, 2014

Asceticism or Epicureanism?

From the Greeks, via the Romans whom loved Greek philosophy, and a series of 19th century philosophers - came our understanding of these two contrasting thoughts: Asceticism and Epicureanism.

Asceticism is a philosophical understanding that there is virtue in abstaining from all physical pleasures including sex, alcohol, luxurious foods, etc.  Ascetics tended to think of the body as evil, or at least out of control, and as something to be brought into the firm control of the will through punishment.  For them, abstinence became an on-going way of life.  In the religious version of this philosophy, the suffering caused by abstaining was offered as a sacrifice to God.  A little self-serving since they believe they do not deserve pleasures or anything nice or pleasurable in the first place.

This photo on the left is the classic example of an ascetic, perched high aloft a column, no food, no water, no where to sleep, they would often stay in such situations until they either fell to their death, starved or dehydrated.  It was their way of showing their piety to their god and all others.

The opposite is Epicureanism, which takes the opposite tack in all situations. The epicureans are devoted to pleasure, and believed that peace, freedom, absence from pain and the simple pleasures of good food and wine are the greatest good in life.  But the epicureans would sometimes fast too, because they felt that there was a greater pleasure in returning to food when you’re really hungry for it than forcing it down when you’ve been over-eating.  This “magnification” was to the point of sickness and the tales of their orgies are well known in ancient literature.

So, we find the competing poles of the behavior observed by all mankind.  Probably 90% or better are of one persuasion or another in this world.  Moderation is not a human condition recognized nor practiced very much these days.


 _________________________________________________________________
Ascetic                                                                                                         Epicurean

A.   Where would you put your life on this scale?
B.     Where would you put your friends on this scale?
C.    Where would you put this church on this scale?
D.   Where would you put America on this scale?
E.     Where would you put Mexico on this scale?
F.     Where would you put Uganda on this scale?

What is right or wrong with Asceticism?

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

What is right or wrong with Epicureanism?

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

Is balance between the two possible?

________________________________________________________________

If so, what would it take or look like?

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

What do you think it would take for you to become more Ascetic?

________________________________________________________________

What do you think it would take for you to become more Epicurean?

________________________________________________________________

What would it take for you to aim for the middle of the scale?

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

As humans we often will move back and forth across this scale, how you feel about yourself is number one on the list for moving either way!  Some will either purposefully or subconsciously deny themselves even the basic needs for life, even to the point of death, or conversely, over indulge to the extent of again jeopardizing their life.  And, as you more than likely know, there are lots of other reasons for overdoing it both directions.  Point is for you to find something in the middle which reflects a balanced healthy you.

No comments: